62. 70
7.10966/14/10
4.12.39.
.S.S. HAITAN.
R4/ 36 -89. oh see of consequent impossibility of establishing
39 -
that the mine was
Japanese,
has reached the conchision
that no clain cas
Gort. Regress
16
properly
se presented to
concurrence before informing Sick. brangie.
Jop. Gost:
This file had been in cirzin, unitil today,
<I had not myself.
seen (62) until yesterday.
Then M Mayall, F.O., rang me up rasked
x
as Seurng
bo lie?
Singgested by M
Alabaster's retiart last encl. but one
bo (35).
if they could have
ealy reply.
(G),
I think we
cam
? In view of
only concu
daim
in the abandonment of the
I had not heard before of
The
Chinese having laid mines any, where
known not to have done rif they
They were
So
Thind the presumptive liability would repose with the Japonesa. But l'imagine that does not constitute a very good
case by itself,
is lacking.
F
I am sorry
action required on
circumstantial evidence
I overlooked the furthe
(G), but it will be seen
from Mr Galeworthing's min. That the F.0.
had been made aware of
? We should send
its contents
coper of
it with
reply to the P.O., regretting that it
had not been sent before saying hat in view of this additional information
we concus
? Also tel. to Gor. in reply to (G),
Saying we
we
have done so.
Nis Andrew's
20.xi.27
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.